Begbies Traynor Group

What is the Difference Between Fraudulent and Wrongful Trading?

Date Published: 02/02/2020

On 28 March 2020, the Government announced new insolvency measures to support businesses under pressure as a result of the coronavirus outbreak. The Government will amend insolvency law to give companies breathing space and keep trading while they explore options for rescue and temporarily suspending wrongful trading provisions retrospectively from 1 March 2020 for three months. You can find out more here. Directors must still be mindful of their fiduciary duty to creditors and shareholders and early advice is always the best protection against any criticism.

If you fear that your company has reached an insolvent position, you must tread very carefully. Insolvency is when you are unable to pay bills as they fall due, or when the total of company liabilities exceeds the total value of assets held.

Trading while knowingly insolvent may lead to accusations of wrongful trading, or the more serious charge of fraudulent trading if you are thought to have deliberately attempted to deny creditors what they are owed.

Both wrongful trading and fraudulent trading are offences under the Insolvency Act 1986 and the Companies Act 2006. Wrongful trading is a civil offence, while fraudulent trading is a criminal offence.

It is incumbent on a director to be aware of their company’s financial position at all times, and putting forward a defence that you were unaware of the insolvent situation will carry little weight. Failing to realise that a company is in financial difficulties may be regarded as negligent, irresponsible, or proof of ‘unfit conduct’ of directors, which will add to the seriousness of the situation.

Begbies Traynor offers a same-day consultation free of charge if you are unsure of your company’s financial position.

Fraudulent trading

If creditors have taken legal action against your company, and you are facing voluntary or compulsory liquidation, your conduct as a director will come under scrutiny during the liquidation process. Allegations of fraudulent trading are extremely serious and ramifications include a prison sentence, director disqualification and/or financial penalties.

The Insolvency Practitioner dealing with the liquidation is obliged to send a report to the Secretary of State on the conduct of directors leading up to the company’s insolvency. If fraudulent trading is suspected, as opposed to wrongful trading, it means that directors have been considered to act to deliberately avoid payment of company liabilities.

Continuing in business, whether that means accepting lines of credit from suppliers, or taking payment on credit from customers knowing that the orders will be unfulfilled, and attempting to maximise the amount of money coming in prior to liquidation, is a serious offence.

Selling company assets at a price less than market value during the time leading up to liquidation could also be viewed with suspicion by the investigating Insolvency Practitioner.

The intention to defraud creditors in this way has to be proven, however, and the Insolvency Service will carry out a thorough investigation in an attempt to reach the truth.

Wrongful trading

A judgment of wrongful trading carries with it potential disqualification as a director for up to 15 years, plus other financial fines and penalties. Being held personally liable for company debts is also a possibility. Although not considered a criminal offence, wrongful trading is a civil offence which is taken very seriously by the courts.

Directors have an obligation to inform company shareholders when an insolvent position has been reached, and to seek the guidance of a licensed Insolvency Practitioner.

Although directors may have carried on trading with good intentions in order to ultimately guide the company out of trouble, they have a duty to put creditors’ interests first when insolvency strikes and to limit creditors’ exposure to additional debt. In many cases this will mean the company should cease trading immediately, however, there are certain exceptions to this such as if the company is midway through a lucrative contract which will bring in more money to the business than it will cost to complete. The rules surrounding this are complex and fraught with complications therefore professional insolvency advice should be taken as a matter of urgency.

Acts of misfeasance can leave you liable for company debts followings its liquidation. If it is found that you have shown preference to one or two creditors over others, you may face questions as to your motives. The interests of creditors as a whole should be at the forefront of director actions, rather than individual creditors.

Begbies Traynor is the largest UK business recovery practice with with an extensive UK office network. Contact a member of our expert team to discuss your business situation.

About The Author

Meet the Team

Jonathan was a founding director of Cooper Williamson which was acquired by Begbies Traynor in October 2013. 

Jonathan was involved in the inception and continued with the development of the "Real Business Rescue" website, which provides advice and assistance for the directors of limited companies which are experiencing various degrees of financial distress throughout the UK. 

Jonathan is a member of the Insolvency Practitioners Association MIPA and is a Member of The Association of Business Recovery Professionals MABRP.

Contact Begbies Traynor Group

Have you been in contact previously
Key Contact

You're in Safe Hands

  • 35+ Years Experience
  • 100+ UK Offices
  • Confidential director support
  • Insolvency market leader

Article Archive